Feed
-
of England posted an update in the Outdoor Activities group Star Gazing May 18, 2020 @ 2:16 pm
As Venus leaves our evening sky you can see it’s phases even with a very modest optical aid I used my 5×10 Zeiss miniquick monocular a few nights back although some claim to have seen the phases of Venus with the naked eye.
-
of England posted an update in the Outdoor Activities group Star Gazing May 11, 2020 @ 4:13 pm
Mercury will be under Venus on the 21st of may for a few days always a good thing to see, after Uranus, the most difficult naked eye planet.
-
of Nevada City, California posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Pantheist Spirituality February 21, 2020 @ 2:22 pm
-
of Portland, Oregon posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Omnideism September 28, 2019 @ 11:06 pm
-
of Portland, Oregon posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Omnideism September 28, 2019 @ 11:05 pm
-
of Portland, Oregon posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Omnideism September 28, 2019 @ 11:05 pm
-
of Wolfville, Canada posted an update in the Intimate Relationships group Singles March 7, 2019 @ 10:42 am
Hi
I don’t see any recent posts
Wolfville, Canada -
of Los Angeles, CA posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Pantheist Vision December 5, 2018 @ 5:27 pm
Why We Incorporated as a Church
by Harold Wood
Pantheist discussion boards on the Internet these days are rife with debates about whether Pantheism can be considered a “religion” or just a “philosophy,” with vigorous arguments by both proponents and opponents.
Observing these debates, I often find that opponents to the idea that Panthei…[Read more] -
of Los Angeles, CA posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Pantheist Vision December 5, 2018 @ 5:25 pm
uploaded new file(s): winter-2018-vol.-35-no.-4-pantheist-vision.pdf to Pantheist Vision
-
of Omaha, Nebraska created the international Schools of Pantheism group Pantheist Vision December 5, 2018 @ 5:14 pm
-
of Mesa, Arizona posted an update in the Writing & Poetry group United Writers February 8, 2018 @ 1:49 pm
The all loving eye of wholesome emptiness, is surrounded by the fullness in the matter of all that suffers.
Love is the gift of suffering, and suffering is the birthright of a question.
Something is the balance of nothing, and nothing creates the open-ness for all to exist.
Suffering ceases to exist, when nothing is being questioned.
T. MacDonald
-
of Ocean Shores, Washington posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group Science 1 February 6, 2018 @ 10:41 am
-
of Omaha, Nebraska created the international Philosophical Discussions group Science 1 February 6, 2018 @ 10:39 am
-
of Macomb, Michigan posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Scientific Pantheism February 6, 2018 @ 8:33 am
I made this video to raise the question of how we approach the idea of divinity. Alan Watts makes an interesting statement on “god.” As Scientific Pantheists, we tend to approach this idea metaphorically. What is your approach to “everything is divine?”
- Zachary Hayes replied
-
of Calabasas, CA posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Scientific Pantheism January 20, 2018 @ 7:10 pm
Sam, I can see nothing scientific in the video and philosophy you described.
It is an example of non-scientific pantheism. Here\’s more about it from the website: -
of Luxemburg, Wisconsin posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Scientific Pantheism December 28, 2017 @ 3:23 pm
Here is an ancient world-wide scientific approach to creation that is directly supported by Pantheism for those who don’t know about the ‘Flower of Life’.
Linked is a short 11 minute YouTube video explaining the basics of how Everything is connected by means of a scientific system through unified consciousness (even the invention of silly old…[Read more]
-
of Luxemburg, Wisconsin posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group The ’God’ Word December 27, 2017 @ 10:55 am
-
of 91302 posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group Agnostic Pantheism December 20, 2017 @ 5:36 pm
Agnostic means anything from “I am pretty sure there is no creator God but I cannot 100% prove that” (and in that sense Dawkins calls himself an agnostic).
To “I am going to live as if there is a creator God but I am not 100% sure there is one.”
Calling oneself an agnostic pantheist would mean that you are (say) 99% pantheist but not…[Read more] -
of Williston, North Dakota posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group The ’God’ Word November 28, 2017 @ 6:56 pm
This is from a book that I am writing…
I do not understand this assertion that evolution is dumb. I am consumed with the belief that it is exactly intelligent. Evolution inexplicably and incessantly expresses knowledge of the viable possibilities in nature through form and function in a seemingly predictive capacity as no selective breeding…[Read more]
-
of COOKEVILLE posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group The ’God’ Word October 26, 2017 @ 2:59 pm
God is a very accurate word for what the Universe is and it\’s time we pantheists used it more. Yes it carries with it connotation of a theistic God but that shouldn\’t be a reason to avoid \”God\”. We should take the word back!
- Sam Thorne replied
- Load More