Feed
-
of Luxemburg, Wisconsin posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Scientific Pantheism December 28, 2017 @ 3:23 pmHere is an ancient world-wide scientific approach to creation that is directly supported by Pantheism for those who don’t know about the ‘Flower of Life’.
Linked is a short 11 minute YouTube video explaining the basics of how Everything is connected by means of a scientific system through unified consciousness (even the invention of silly old…[Read more]
-
of Luxemburg, Wisconsin posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group
The ’God’ Word December 27, 2017 @ 10:55 amThe answer to everything lies beyond the limitations of discovery.
To answer the unanswerable is to manifest the fear of not knowing what you’ve secretly always known.
“We are all energy, dancing for itself” – Jim Carrey
-
of 91302 posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Agnostic Pantheism December 20, 2017 @ 5:36 pmAgnostic means anything from “I am pretty sure there is no creator God but I cannot 100% prove that” (and in that sense Dawkins calls himself an agnostic).
To “I am going to live as if there is a creator God but I am not 100% sure there is one.”
Calling oneself an agnostic pantheist would mean that you are (say) 99% pantheist but not…[Read more] -
of Williston, North Dakota posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group
The ’God’ Word November 28, 2017 @ 6:56 pmThis is from a book that I am writing…
I do not understand this assertion that evolution is dumb. I am consumed with the belief that it is exactly intelligent. Evolution inexplicably and incessantly expresses knowledge of the viable possibilities in nature through form and function in a seemingly predictive capacity as no selective breeding…[Read more]
-
of COOKEVILLE posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group
The ’God’ Word October 26, 2017 @ 2:59 pmGod is a very accurate word for what the Universe is and it\’s time we pantheists used it more. Yes it carries with it connotation of a theistic God but that shouldn\’t be a reason to avoid \”God\”. We should take the word back!
-
Sam Thorne replied
After all, it is just a label we use to describe the indescribable thing that is the intertwined existence of everything we know to be ‘Life’.
-
Sam Thorne replied
-
of COOKEVILLE posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Agnostic Pantheism October 26, 2017 @ 2:53 pmYou can’t be agnostic and pantheist anymore than you can be agnostic and christian or agnostic and muslim. I am a pantheist and i believe that there are NO supernatural beings or higher power above, behind, or below the universe. The universe already is that higher power and that’s what pantheists believe by definition. You can’t be a…[Read more]
-
of COOKEVILLE posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Scientific Pantheism October 26, 2017 @ 2:48 pmIs anyone interested in discussing how scientific pantheism and atheism are polar opposites! And that we should stop presenting them as compatible.
-
Paul Harrison replied
Atheism (in current usage) = disbelief in a creator God or other type of supernatural god.
Scientific pantheism does not believe in those things. Ergo it is compatible with atheism – ie you can be an atheist and also a scientific pantheist.
However, that does not mean it is identical with or equivalent to atheism.
Atheism is simply a negative,…[Read more]
-
Paul Harrison replied
-
of Freeport posted an update in the Heightened Awareness group
Psychedelic Studies October 25, 2017 @ 4:29 pmThere\’s a new research chemical that I came across the other day. The effects were mind blowing. I felt a connection to the universe in a way that I\’ve never felt possible.
-
of Charleston WV created the international Schools of Pantheism group
Pantheist Spirituality July 11, 2017 @ 10:46 am -
of Glasgow, United Kingdom posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group
The ’God’ Word July 8, 2017 @ 8:23 amThe Source and Fullfilment of all that is?
-
Poffo Ortiz of Portland, Oregon posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Omnideism March 2, 2017 @ 4:23 amone of my first video interviews with Chandler…
-
Poffo Ortiz of Portland, Oregon posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Omnideism March 2, 2017 @ 4:20 am -
Robert E. Fawley of Cincinnati posted an update in the Philosophical Discussions group
The ’God’ Word March 1, 2017 @ 4:25 pmI do not use the word \”God\”, I rather use \”god\” or \”divine\” depending on who I am talking to, I do it because it is much easier for most people to understand. Everything is a being and that being is divine.
-
Rich Blegen of Denver, Colorado posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Scientific Pantheism February 6, 2017 @ 1:19 pmThat sounds like a great description for scientific and naturalistic pantheism. It definitely resonates with me. 🙂
-
Waldo Noesta of Punta Gorda, Florida posted an update in the Writing & Poetry group
United Writers February 4, 2017 @ 7:43 pmHey folks, my revamped website is back up and running in full. Read articles, essays, and poetry pertaining to Pantheism and other elements of “spirituality for the Next Age” at Not Two
-
Waldo Noesta of Punta Gorda, Florida posted an update in the Books & Reading group
Pantheism Book Club February 4, 2017 @ 7:40 pmHey folks, my revamped website is back up and running in full. Read articles, essays, and poetry pertaining to Pantheism and other elements of “global spirituality for the Next Age” at Not Two
-
Charles Beebe replied
Congratulations…one raised silhouette-chalice to you!
-
Charles Beebe replied
-
of Charleston WV created the international Schools of Pantheism group
Scientific Pantheism February 2, 2017 @ 5:25 pm-
Paul Harrison replied
Thanks Charles. I changed the description and clicked save, but it did not show the change.
Here’s my new description, please could you get it in there. Thanks.
Scientific pantheism is a strongly naturalistic approach to pantheism, which encourages deep reverence for Nature and the wider Universe, caring for nature and the planet, promoting human…[Read more]-
Charles Beebe replied
Sorry about that, Paul. There was a bug on the Group Details page, which has now been fixed. I went ahead and added your text to the description from the backend, but that does not have the option to notify everyone of the change. If you would still like to notify them, just make a small edit to the new text yourself, check the box to notify…[Read more]
-
Charles Beebe replied
-
Paul Harrison replied
-
Anna Lowell of McCall, Idaho posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Biotheism January 8, 2017 @ 7:17 amOf course I had to find you up in this crazy computer land! Howdy howdy!
-
Anna Lowell of McCall posted an update in the Books & Reading group
Pantheism Book Club January 2, 2017 @ 7:06 pmIm currently beginning to read \’Belief Without Borders\’ by Mercadante. A book about the \’spiritual but not religious\’. Pretty objective considering it\’s written by a christian (although a spritual wanderer at heart).
-
R. Mark Ellis replied
Well, here’s a comment. I couldn’t find a “reply” button, so hopefully this meets what you are looking for
-
Charles Beebe replied
Hi @ellisd and @anna_lowell! Right now, you “Comment” on an original post (1st level response to a post) and “Reply” to the Comments (2nd and lower level responses). The wording may change, but at this point, you did it as ‘correctly’ as it gets! 🙂
-
Anna de Omnia replied
@charles_beebe…practicing 🙂 also, Mark and I were noting that once a ‘comment’ notification shows up in the top right, you can click on it and view them, but after you click on them then your list of notifications goes away. So i just had to navigate back to this page to make this comment. When i just went to send you a personal email, i…[Read more]
-
Charles Beebe replied
Hi Anna, you can actually get back to your old notifications, it’s just obscured. Basically, the notification marker goes away after you have read the message, but if you hover over the space to the right of the messages icon in the upper right, it will say “No new notifications.” If you click those words, it takes you to your notifications…[Read more]
-
Anna de Omnia replied
-
R. Mark Ellis replied
-
Peter Moriarty of Los Angeles, California posted an update in the Schools of Pantheism group
Biotheism December 23, 2016 @ 8:28 amThis is new. Thanks Perry and Charles for all you\’ve done to make this a reality. I look forward to getting involved and finding my own space here on Pantheism.com!
-
Peter Moriarty replied
Looks great!
-
Charles Beebe replied
Thanks Peter. Glad to see you created your group! I am going to change your group name to “Biotheism” (dropping the ‘1’), since I know you are the original creator. Did you possibly try to create the group, stop and then try again? A number should be appended only if an identical group name exists, that is, after a (non-numbered) first group is…[Read more]
-
Charles Beebe replied
-
Peter Moriarty replied
- Load More
